Abstract
This study examines Arthur Miller’s The Crucible as a literary reflection of McCarthyism, investigating how Miller critiques the dangers of paranoia and abuses of authority in societies overtaken by fear. The research questions guiding this study are: How does The Crucible parallel the hysteria and oppressive tactics of the McCarthy era, and what does Miller’s work reveal about the ethical implications of power used irresponsibly? Through a close reading of The Crucible, this project explores the Salem witch trials as an allegory for the McCarthy hearings, specifically focusing on themes of mass paranoia, social control, and the manipulation of authority figures. Additionally, analysis of key characters like Abigail Williams, Mary Warren, and John Proctor highlights Miller’s perspective on the individual's ethical struggle within an oppressive system. The methodology combines literary analysis and criticism of Miller’s text with historical research on McCarthyism, to provide context and support for these parallels. Findings to date suggest that The Crucible remains a powerful critique of societal structures that exploit fear to suppress dissent and compromise justice. By drawing attention to the consequences of hysteria-driven policies, this research aims to situate The Crucible within a broader conversation on the ethical responsibilities of authority figures and the importance of safeguarding civil liberties. This study contributes to an understanding of how literature can reflect and challenge historical patterns of oppression, underlining Miller’s work as a cautionary tale against repeating the mistakes of the past.
Research Poster
Research Paper
Presentation
Comments & Feedback